T1057 Process Discovery in real malware

ATT&CK technique T1057 Process Discovery appears in 1529 publicly analyzed samples on MalwareAnalyzer by Cyble, 1.3% of the analyzed corpus. Seven-day prevalence is falling (1 recent vs 6 prior). Most associated families: HUILoader, Fugrafa, Emotet, Delf, Lmir.

Tactics: discovery

Prevalence in the corpus

Malware families using T1057

Example samples

Canonical technique definition: MITRE ATT&CK T1057 (ATT&CK v19.1, CC BY 4.0).

Frequently asked about T1057

How common is ATT&CK T1057 (Process Discovery) in real malware?
ATT&CK technique T1057 Process Discovery appears in 1529 publicly analyzed samples on MalwareAnalyzer by Cyble, 1.3% of the analyzed corpus. Seven-day prevalence is falling (1 recent vs 6 prior). Most associated families: HUILoader, Fugrafa, Emotet, Delf, Lmir.
Is T1057 becoming more common?
Prevalence is falling: 1 sample in the last seven days against 6 in the seven days before. This measures submissions to MalwareAnalyzer by Cyble, so it reflects what is being submitted here rather than global attacker behaviour.
Which malware families use T1057?
In this corpus T1057 is most associated with HUILoader (128), Fugrafa (95), Emotet (67), Delf (55), Lmir (54). Counts are analyzed samples per family in which the technique was observed.
What share of analyzed samples use T1057?
1.3% of the publicly analyzed corpus (1529 of 114611 samples) exhibits T1057. Technique attribution comes from behavior captured during real sandbox detonation and from static analysis, not from a vendor label.

All ATT&CK techniques in the corpus · Latest analyzed threats